5 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

I didn't really think "news" came from it being new. And yes, I wholly agree with that media consolidation is bad, but I don't think (based on limited experience) that the multinationals are going out of their way to influence coverage except in the case of Murdoch's Fox News and, even then, I think it's more about tone than actual stories. But, of course, I very well could be wrong. As I said, I'm speculating.

Expand full comment

I have bad news for you: the word "news" absolutely does come from "new."

https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=news

Expand full comment

IT DOES?

Expand full comment

Umm, Murdoch isn't confined to Fox News, they're a global print news empire, the influence is real, not imaginary, and well documented.

Expand full comment

This is a fair take but all of these major news corporations are owned by Billionaires who dictate the type of coverage they want to their subordinates. Its not just Murdoch and Fox News, its ALL of them. All of these billionaires want Trump re-elected and the big 4 networks and major papers have all put their thumbs on the scale for Trump if you are paying attention. It is not a conspiracy to acknoledge that the rich are using the media they own to convince Americans to vote for a fascist so they can stop paying taxes. It's just the reality of what is happening here. I don't know how to combat the entire American media apparatus acting in bad faith, but here we are and its just as bad for America as you would expect it to be...

Expand full comment