The other day, the NYTs covered the British election outcome by saying that a landslide win wasn't really a landslide, basically because not enough people voted. Call me stupid, but any party losing 252 seats, and retaining only 100 something seats is a drubbing, no matter how many people voted for the winners. The NYTs is increasingly losing the plot.
The other day, the NYTs covered the British election outcome by saying that a landslide win wasn't really a landslide, basically because not enough people voted. Call me stupid, but any party losing 252 seats, and retaining only 100 something seats is a drubbing, no matter how many people voted for the winners. The NYTs is increasingly losing the plot.
The other day, the NYTs covered the British election outcome by saying that a landslide win wasn't really a landslide, basically because not enough people voted. Call me stupid, but any party losing 252 seats, and retaining only 100 something seats is a drubbing, no matter how many people voted for the winners. The NYTs is increasingly losing the plot.